I've been spending a lot of time lately
thinking about my upcoming class in eSwatini (Swaziland still rolls
off the tongue more easily!). As I have been thinking about how to
highlight the relevance of the New Testament for cultures and
churches that are in many ways different from my own, one question
that came to mind is “how much religious syncretism do they deal
with?” And fairly immediately, the answer that occurred to me was,
“probably about as much as we do.”
When we think of syncretism, it's easy
to picture an indigenous religious practitioner lumping Jesus in with
the gods of his tribe, or people who treat prayer like a spell that
goads God into doing what we want. But the Oxford dictionary is
nowhere near so narrow. It defines syncretism as, “the amalgamation
or attempted amalgamation of different religions, cultures, or
schools of thought.” A definition like this leaves us with the
convicting reality that when we import our strongly held cultural
values into our gospel, we become guilty of syncretism.
I just read an article
that made reference to “the problem of individualism.” Something
about that phrase stopped me in my tracks, and I realized that it was
because I have never heard individualism talked about that way. Now,
the Bible is not communist, as some have tried to argue. My
understanding is that it interweaves a strong community orientation
with individual responsibility. But almost no one (at least in the
Canadian circles I know) talks about individualism as “a problem.”
Individualism in North America is so celebrated that we have brought
it into the church with nary a thought. It is a hard thing to look
past our cultural biases, and let our values be reprioritized and
reshaped by scripture. I think that this is one of the reasons why missions – a
missions that is from everywhere to everywhere – needs to continue.
We can see the blind spots of other cultures, and they can see the blind spots of ours.
The point of this post is not to rag on
individualism. If it needs doing, there are others who can do that as
well or better than I. The point is that religious syncretism isn't
something “out there” that we have to stop. The problem with
syncretism is in our hearts. We're all guilty of it. It is in fact
the first lie, the first sin, the one that said, “You can have God
and everything else.”
So am I prepared for syncretism in
eSwatini? Who knows. But the better question is, “Am I prepared for
the syncretism that rears its ugly head in my own life?” That is
the greater challenge.
Very thought provoking. I had not given much thought to syncretism, but you are correct when you say it is a part of our church communities as it is in other places.
ReplyDelete